Managers and Influencers everywhere:
Which one of these works best as a call to action?
- We need 37 new accounts to reach our revenue goal for 2009
- We need more than 30 new accounts to reach our revenue goal for 2009
- We need a bunch of new accounts to reach our revenue goal for 2009
Most of would probably choose #1. But why?
Because of the power of specificity.
The first example is so concrete we know it can be broken down into a measurable, do-able plan. That creates some immediate energy and confidence.
Need credibility to create commitment and action? Of course you do. And precise details show the listeners that you are probably telling the truth. A “guesstimate” doesn't have the same impact because it leaves a little "doubt cloud' hanging out there. Without concrete facts people may think that you are just making the whole thing up--or exaggerating a bit.
Statistics and precise details not only help with authenticity but create curiosity and mental involvement. The human mind latches on to that which is precise but has to wrestle with fuzziness. When people around us have to work extra hard at what we are saying, they begin to tune out.
What can you be more specific about today?












Hi Steve
Perhaps not managers or influencers related - although, come to think of it - but coincidently wrote a blog post about a confusing ad I saw yesterday:
Optional
Marketing managers really need to be specific when promoting a new product - this one IMHO failed to do so by listing an extra option - optional 10 year warranty - to a product that according to them can give you 20 years of use.
Karin H. (Keep It Simple Sweetheart, specially in business)
Posted by: Karin H. | March 19, 2009 at 10:07 AM
Steve,
Thanks for being so specific. I am conducting a course and I will ensure I give 5 specific small and significant actions people can take to enhance another person's performance.
David
Posted by: David Zinger | March 19, 2009 at 10:18 AM
Hi there, Karin,
Thank you for the reference to your post (readers, go click and check it out!).
Do you think the marketing copywriters are still employed:-)?
Posted by: Steve Roesler | March 19, 2009 at 10:50 AM
David (this is specifically for David),
You are a fast learner. How do I know?
This was posted at 9:14 and you internalized the concept by 10:18 as noted in the timing of your comment.
Have you considered challenging the group to equal your feat by implementing 5 specific actions in 64 minutes?
Please fill us in after the gig. Enquiring Minds will want to know...
Posted by: Steve Roesler | March 19, 2009 at 10:55 AM
Specifity always sells better. "Everyone" has one is not as effective as "Joe and Mary down the street have one."
But you should start at the higher level, the concept. Everyone bought into "hope" but it is when the specific programs see the light of day when problems develop. Same same in sales.
great topic, steve.
Posted by: gl hoffman | March 19, 2009 at 11:35 AM
Hi Steve
I hope they 'sacked' the decision maker at a higher level ;-)
The one who thought: lets "invent" something that sounds really good, and adds more money to the client's bill but which is in fact not really needed for our quality products.
(Wonder what the R&D department thinks of that ad ;-))
Karin H
Posted by: Karin H. | March 19, 2009 at 11:49 AM
Two simple words I learned early on that always brought me to specificity and which can support others to do so as well: How so?
Posted by: peter vajda | March 19, 2009 at 02:22 PM
Ah, Peter:
Specificity plus Simplicity.
You can always be relied upon for a "Thought for Today."
Posted by: Steve Roesler | March 19, 2009 at 02:31 PM
GL,
When H. Ross Perot waxed poetic about the devil being in the details, he knew of what he was speaking.
This is always a stretch for me since I am a high-concept, big picture guy. Yet nothing happens until the picture gets so clear that others are able to see it the same way.
Thanks for adding the "problem" aspect...
Posted by: Steve Roesler | March 19, 2009 at 02:34 PM
Sorry. "37" is not specific enough.
If your goal was to open 100 accounts for the year and you had 63 to date, then your statement "37 more" would be specific enough.
Because your goal is revenue related, your specific ask need also to be stated with a specifc revenue component. What if the remaining 37 accounts are not average? Then your new accounts target is something more or less than 37. Your "37" leaves the receiver to assume something about each account and that, by defintion is not specific.
Posted by: K O | March 19, 2009 at 06:19 PM
Being specific was always a challenge when preaching sermons with a wide range of ages and life settings.
But you are right; specific is sticky and energizing.
Keep creating...Mike
Posted by: Mike Wagner | March 19, 2009 at 06:27 PM
KO, no doubt if your scenario was what I was trying to emphasize, that would, indeed, be the case. In fact, you underscore the point quite nicely.
The idea here was simply to get folks thinking about the importance of degree of specificity. As a former sales manager, I feel your goal-oriented pain:-)
Thanks for taking the time to think that deeply and write that clearly...
Posted by: Steve Roesler | March 19, 2009 at 07:59 PM
Mike,
Ah, the demands of broad-based audiences and the need for multiple specific examples for multiple demographics.
Such is the life of the leader...
Posted by: Steve Roesler | March 19, 2009 at 08:06 PM