Do people at work know who you really are?
Do you see the people around you clearly enough to know who they really are?
I was thinking about the things an executive coach and advisor
really does--or should be doing. One of the most important is this: Seeing people for who they are, realizing what they can be, and helping to take them there.
If that doesn't sound very "business-like," it probably isn't in the traditional sense of "business-like."
And therein lies the issue. Organizations of all kinds hire the best people they can find. Those folks look at the "people are our most important asset" blurbs in the corporate recruiting brochures.Then they sign on with high hopes.
But what happens down the road that causes discontent, retention issues, and the need to search for "talent?" Weren't those people talented when they were hired?
This Is What I See
I see highly motivated people getting performance appraisals that are designed to force rankings on a curve so they never accurately portray an individual's contribution and worth. I see employees at all levels getting feedback on the gaps in their performance--and then receiving orders to "close the gaps." I see the same people then coming to workshops and seminars, hearing theoretical--but good--teaching, only to go back to work and say "what do I actually do with that?"
In nearly 30 years of managing, consulting, and coaching, I can count on one hand the number of people I've seen fired for technical incompetence. They get released for issues of character, the inability to relate well with other people, or not being able to "close the gap."
Here are my thoughts as a result:
1. The character issue
can be discerned during the hiring process. Discernment should be a
highly- valued talent possessed by those interviewing. If not, get an
objective third party to help with that element. Someone who sees
others clearly and
quickly for who they are.
2. Relating well with other people. You can send people to class to learn skills. But does the day-to-day interaction at work encourage and reward healthy relationships? A manager with a coaching/relational approach can set the tone for how things get done and how people are expected to interact in the process
3. Workshops and Education. Two things I enjoy with a passion. Neither immediately changes my own behavior very much. But I learn ways to think differently and more clearly. Then, when presented with an opportunity to actually do what was taught, the education leads to application. People have the most chance of bumping up their game when given a chance to discuss and apply new knowledge right away.
Manager As Coach
Managers can coach effectively when they see their people clearly because they've built relationships that let them know who their folks really are. If they don't have the time or inclination, then they need to get some help to build the talent that seems, at times, to be hiding. It's probably not hiding. It might just be invisible to the naked eye.
What to Do:
If you want your talent to be valued, you've got to let people know who you really are. Make it impossible for them not to see you clearly.
If you are a manager, be intentional about "seeing clearly." If it's a little difficult for you, get some help.
You and I wouldn't build a house in the dark. We need light to see in order to build. And unless your a truffle, you need a lot of light in order to grow and use your talent to perform.
As always: weigh in. Share your thoughts on clarity, talent, and building people by seeing yourself--and them- clearly. Let the community learn from what you've learned. Click on Comments and join the discussion.
How about related reading? Thought you'd never ask.
- Wally Bock's "How Do I Trust Thee" fits the bill. I've read it more than once.
- "The Nature To Nurture" is one of my favorites from the deep-thinking Jim Stroup at Managing Leadership.
- Lisa Gates asks women some insightful self-knowledge questions at Craving Balance.
- "Noticing That We're Not Noticing" is Bob Burg's way of highlighting the importance of--well, "noticing."
- Hmm. "Who Do You Love?" has Mike Henry, Sr. exploring who companies really put first.













I think you encapsulate well the need to know people well in order to encourage their potential. You present an memorable image: people are not truffles, and need light to grow. Thanks, too, for the list of related reading.
Posted by: Becky Robinson | August 17, 2009 at 06:25 AM
Hi Steve,
Thank you for a powerful post.
I believe the hardest thing is for a manager to see their people clearly when they've had judgments (by themselves of others) heaped upon them. Judgments are fine and all well and good, except they are not always accurate. How do we get through the haziness of what we think we know, or what others have told us about a person in order to find the true character (and possible great potential) underneath?
As executive coaches, when we are brought in to work with a leader, it is our responsibility to approach and work with that person without judgment (at least in the beginning). Setting aside our mind chatter about what is or isn't true about that person, I believe, is the best way to see them fresh, as others (including themselves) don't. This allows us to see pure human potential and provide support for the best chance of success for that person to reach their goals. Its hard enough for us to do that!
I wonder if this might be a more difficult thing for internal managers to do with their employees. With all the complexities of culture, politics, pace, and change in the workplace - what chance do managers have to actually see their people clearly? It takes time, it takes skill, it takes compassion and empathy. Hard things to come by in the business world.
Posted by: Mary Jo Asmus | August 17, 2009 at 08:12 AM
Mary Jo,
You raise a good point about all of the factors that get in the way for managers, not the least of which is the internal politics/moving-up-the-hierarchy thing. Not only does a clear picture require clarity about one's self; it requires a depth of character that won't allow the inaccurate or intentional sniping of others to color one's opinion of an employee.
It's not easy to manage well. . .
Posted by: Steve Roesler | August 17, 2009 at 09:36 AM
Hello, Becky,
Glad the truffles thing stuck as well as the additional reading.
Here's to a good week. . .
Posted by: Steve Roesler | August 17, 2009 at 09:37 AM
Steve, thanks so much for the link...and I particularly love Bob Burg's post about noticing. That word is a great word for managers to put in their coaching ditty bag. It goes hand in hand with Mary Jo's caution about clearing our judgments before we work with people.
What did you notice about that? (action, event)
What am I noticing here? (feelings, behavior)
So if we notice that we don't often notice well, we could first ask ourselves the noticing questions before we sit down to talk with people.
Posted by: Lisa Gates | August 17, 2009 at 03:13 PM
Hi Steve,
I appreciate your "business-unusual" approach here.
Some thoughts:
You write, "…They get released for issues of character, the inability to relate well with other people, or not being able to "close the gap." So, when one interviews a talent, perhaps one isn't interviewing a person, just "a talent," a role, a character actor, but perhaps not the "person" we're looking for.
How often, for one example, does a person-oriented "behavioral" interview take place ? (Tell me a time when you found yourself in conflict with (a boss, client, co-worker, etc.) How did the conflict develop? What were the differing perspectives? How did you contribute to the conflict/and the solution? (and we all do)?, How did you feel and why? etc. - one way to see folks for who they really are - real, authentic, honest, trustworthy, fake, blaming, narcissistic, etc. Yes, indeed, find someone to help you with this if you need support to hire "people."
In my experience, there are only two reasons managers shy away from coaching others: (1) they don't know how or (2) they're unwilling. So, look for root causes here and see what's true. There's a myriad of "excuses" for not coaching others, but very few reasons.
You say, "If you are a manager, be intentional about "seeing clearly. If it's a little difficult for you, get some help." I think this is huge.
Coming to work every day from a place of intentionality and mindfulness, where one is consciously engaged in one's life at work…not robotically, like an automaton, habitually, but with a sense of "freshness," with eyes wide open. It's not only about not building a house in the dark, it's also about insuring a firm foundation, i.e., "who am I" and "how am I" in this moment, and in this moment, and in this moment…
Lisa and Mary Jo make fine points, IMHO, about "noticing" and making clear judgments. For me that means being self-aware, focused, conscious, and mindful. And, consciously, what's getting in the way of my being clear and conscious? What makes me "off," and away from my self? What am I giving my attention to and why? What am I feeling in my body? How's my breathing, my heart rate, my emotions, my inner dialog, my posture, my face. What are these things telling me about me!
Being conscious, and thus less and less (unconsciously) reactive and robotic and "business-like," can support one to "know thyself" and that has to happen before any one else can "know me."
Posted by: peter vajda | August 17, 2009 at 04:13 PM
Steve,
I like the suggestion about being "seen clearly". It is about being transparent or "being real." I prefer to work with people that I don't have to work at trying to figure them out.
As leaders, I believe that the defining difference lies in how we view our people. If the leader views his / her team as individuals with unique talents,strengths and dreams, capable of continual growth - the interest and investment will be high. In contrast, the leader that views people as machines is unlikely to spend any time or energy investing in them.
Ultimately, leaders who focus on developing the capacity of their team and not just getting things done, achieve the best results.
Posted by: Craig Mostat | August 17, 2009 at 07:00 PM
Actually, Steve, your comment is very business-like. You just used slightly different language. My clients usually say something to the effect of here's where I am, there's where I want to get to. Can you help me bridge the gap?
I'm uncomfortable with the degree of "victim" conversation that I read in the blog and the comments. I believe that rather than being a victim it's quite possible to lean on people without thinking of it as a burden. In addition, in this new world, people simply have to learn to manage up or they will be in difficulty. That includes managing their manager and developing networks of mentors. Admittedly, ignorance is the issue. . .but we can't stay ignorant forever.
Again, unlike Peter, I disagree completely that you have to know yourself before anyone else can know you. Better theory and practice indicate that to a high degree people tell us who we are. I know who I am and am not as a result of people telling me. Obviously I solicited some of that. But I also listen intently.
I deal with some of this in a blog: http://tinyurl.com/pnxdjj
Posted by: Dan Erwin | August 17, 2009 at 10:17 PM
Lisa,
If I don't steal some of your lines I'll be surprised.
Agreed: Bob's idea of "noticing" is a really useful verbal reminder.
Posted by: Steve Roesler | August 18, 2009 at 08:35 AM
Craig, Peter, and Dan,
I'm responding once because I think that Craig addressed simplicity of the issue. That is, taking the guesswork out of who you are so people don't have to tap dance around you until they get the song right.
Heck, my clients all say "Here's where I am and here's where I want to go."
My questions are these:
1. Do you know yourself well enough to figure out whether you can get there on your own and if not, who else and what else do you need?
2. Do the other people involved know you well enough to be able to "get it done" without having to figure you out?
As for other people telling me who I am, the best they can do is tell me how they experience me in a given situation. If I find that it's not a match for what I intended, I'll make some adjustments. But heck, I won't change who I am--I'll change "how" I am if the situation requires it in order to "get it done".
For me, the issue is simply this: If I don't act consistently as a result of my nature and character, then no one will be able to offer me any useful feedback. I've conducted 360s where the recipient had 10 different behavioral narratives on the same category from 10 different respondents. Why? He was playing people. No one actually knew who he was. And, as an unbelievable stroke of coincidental timing with this comment, I was just informed that he has been "let go".
The reason: his boss got tired of "trying to grab jello."
Posted by: Steve Roesler | August 18, 2009 at 08:54 AM
Congratulations! This post was selected as one of the five best independent business blog posts of the week in my Three Star Leadership Midweek Review of the Business Blogs.
http://blog.threestarleadership.com/2009/08/19/81909-midweek-look-at-the-independent-business-blogs.aspx
Wally Bock
Posted by: Wally Bock | August 19, 2009 at 05:27 PM
Steve,
Great topic. I have found that most managers can be excellent coaches if - and it is a significant if - they have a basic level of competency in helping skills. The old "planning, organizing, controlling, & evaluating" functions of management that are taught in business schools tend to get in the way in a managerial coaching relationship. Listening, non-judgmental reflecting, and the ability to give non-defensive feedback is the currency of the realm in helping relationships. I have had good success with teaching managers these skills in a workshop setting. They usually get it and, in an era of layoffs, find that coaching layoff survivors pays big dividends.
Posted by: David Noer | August 25, 2009 at 02:16 PM
David,
The biz school skills certainly are needed. Problem is, they can't be executed effectively without the cooperation and performance of the people involved.
Your line about coaching layoff survivors really rings true. What's more valuable in tough times than having a boss who offering guidance and support?
Thanks for weighing in. . .
Posted by: Steve Roesler | August 25, 2009 at 02:55 PM
Thats amazing, I found You'll Know Them When They Know You is something better than others.
Posted by: Tyres Dealer | November 13, 2009 at 02:08 AM
your blog is too good. Cool in looks informative in Material...Thanks For sharing Information with Us.
Posted by: bba india | May 07, 2010 at 02:05 AM