You can dramatically impact participation in any meeting or presentation.
Do You Want A Lot of "Give and Take?"
Offer up your idea while your seated and stay seated.
Sure, your big idea contains a lot of forethought and preparation. But if you genuinely want spontaneous discussion, kick back and let things flow. Sitting down puts you on equal footing with the rest of the group. As a result, you're a lot more likely to hear the pros and cons, agreement and disagreement, refinements, and spin-off ideas.
Do You Want to Emphasize Importance?
Not you...your idea.
Think about this: when someone "rises to the occasion," the rest of the room settles back and concedes the floor. The dynamics shift from an informal discussion to something more critical that says:
"I have an opinion on this."
"I'm prepared to support it."
"The issue is bigger than the normal agenda items."
You can have it both ways
If you want to put your stake in the ground with a stand-up mini-presentation, go ahead; then, take a seat and ask for discussion.
Shifting your physical presence can go a long way to learning how to be influential in the right ways at the right time.












Interesting ideas. I wonder how this translates for conference calls for those on virtual teams.
Posted by: Shelley Gable | July 18, 2010 at 08:40 PM
Good post. It's always good to remember that team members may have excellent ideas they've yet to unveil. Taking over the floor may disrupt the team atmosphere. When you do stand do so infrequently, be spot-on, and sit down eye-to-eye for feedback. Good thoughts.
Posted by: Matt Jury | July 18, 2010 at 09:27 PM
Thanks Steve, The nonverbal issues of presentation, including sitting and standing are often missed by presenters, but as you say, they have a powerful impact.
--Dan
Posted by: Dan Erwin | July 20, 2010 at 08:28 AM
These are important points. Cues of this kind can have a disproportionate impact. They are not often discussed in presentation workshops and discussions.
Harris Silverman
www.HarrisSilverman.com
Posted by: Harris Silverman - Business Coach | July 22, 2010 at 09:05 AM
Thanks, Steve. I think being able not to speak a lot and listening to others is a kind of leadership.
It means that you can control yourself and sitation, have impact. But you are also smart and can be relaxed.
Posted by: Helen Tucker | July 31, 2010 at 07:45 AM
It really takes a big person to relinquish his/her voice for a few minutes and get everybody's feedback. A lot of bosses try to be supermen (superwomen) and take over the conversation without regard for the ideas of others. You never know who has the better idea, the plan that saves the most time and money, nor the solution to the entire problem...and trust me, it isn't always the boss.
If you are on the other side and given the chance to speak, keep it clean, be respectful and keep it simple!
Karen, The Resume Chick (on Google or Twitter for questions, comments or violent reactions)
Posted by: twitter.com/theresumechick | August 03, 2010 at 01:57 PM
I agree that you should know not only what to do but also when. And I noticed a lot of successful people (leaders) are always good listeners. I think it's very important!!!
Posted by: Tommy Liano | August 17, 2010 at 02:34 PM
Steve,
My preference is to stand when I'm making any sort of presentation. But I do find it difficult / awkward when I'm speaking to a really small group. When I attend a meeting where I may be expected to speak, I try to position myself in a place that gives me a bit of a power boost so that whether I'm standing or seated I still capture people's attention.
Posted by: Chris Witt | September 02, 2010 at 05:37 PM
Certainly a good thought. I guess for many, not escalating your idea into a mini-presentation could be seen as 'selling yourself short', and if someone genuinely believes that they've had a brilliant idea, they're not likely to want to risk seeing it disappear as others give it less than their full attention.
Posted by: Simon Oates @Leadership Expert | September 11, 2010 at 10:29 AM
I think the author's ideas make a whole lot of sense. I wouldn't have thought of something as simple as sitting or standing as having a large impact on the group's mentality, etc. However, framing it in this context has made me certain to be self-aware in future presentations.
Posted by: Josh F | September 15, 2010 at 02:25 PM
Great thoughts. I am currently enrolled in a Managerial Communications course and we spend a considerable amount of time discussing presentation techniques. It really is amazing how much there is to consider when speaking to a group. Choosing between sitting or standing is related to choosing whether or not you want to speak "to" or "with" the group. Sometime it is hard to let the boss persona go. I like the suggestion of a mini presentation-- standing first to get your point across and then taking a seat to foster discussion.
Posted by: Kelley | September 20, 2010 at 03:59 PM
The author brings up some interesting points. I have never thought of one's position -- sitting or standing -- as being used in directing attention. I believe that such a decision depends on not only the importance of the idea presented, but also the setting in which the idea is conveyed. If one were at a business meeting with colleagues, I believe it would be ideal for him or her to stand up in order to stress importance. However if one were in a meeting and he or she is already the designated leader of the group, then the leader should remain seated in order to demonstrate humility and avoid conveying a condescending attitude towards the employees. Just a thought.
Posted by: Anoop | September 22, 2010 at 05:50 PM