I received an email from a reader requesting "a post I recalled reading about 'paying attention to people.' " I think this was the one from December, 2009. The original experiment and its impact on management and human behavior is timeless.
In the 1920s, physiologist Elton Mayo conducted experiments at the Hawthorne Electrical Works in Chicago.
He was trying to confirm his theory that better lighting led to greater productivity. So, he had the lights on the factory floor turned up. Voila! As he expected, production levels increased, too. Done deal?
As an afterthought he decided to turn the lights down just to see what would happen. Production went up again. In fact, he found that whatever he did with the lighting, production increased.
Novel thought: Mayo discussed his findings with the workers who were involved. They told him that the interest Mayo and his researchers showed toward them made them feel more valued. They were accustomed to being ignored.
While the increased lighting no doubt made things brighter and healthier, it was the increase in morale that most impacted improvement in productivity. This became known as the Hawthorne Effect.
Most people schooled in management & organization development are well aware of the studies. However, I'm finding more and more business folks who haven't been exposed to them; I thought it might be a good idea to revisit what is the beginning of the "human relations" movement in management.
While scientists and pseudo-scientists have argued everything from methodology to the number of toilet breaks employees of that era received, the simple learning is this: When you pay attention to people, tell them what you are doing, and ask their opinion about things, the response--all else being equal--is a boost in morale and productivity. I dare say that Elton had stumbled upon Employee Engagement long before the term became popular.
I'm wondering: after 80+ years, why isn't this fundamental learning a part of every organization's modus operandi?
photo source: www.library.hbs.edu
____________________________
Bonus:
Kudos. Over the years, we've actually set up systems for certain clients who needed a tickler that popped up on the calendar reminding them what to do, when, and how regarding "recognition checks." That's not our core business, but it was a helpful solution for many.
Would such a solution be helpful in your company? Look no further.
How about a systematic approach with a tech solution for the "recognition challenged"? Check out the folks at Kudos who have created a terrific way to help manager who may not "feel" it but darn right well out to "do" it. Hat tip (well, "kudos") to Co-CEO Tom Short for cluing us in to their approach.
Disclaimer: Neither All Things Workplace nor The Steve Roesler Group has a business arrangement with, nor gains revenue from, Kudos.












Recognition, or even simple acknowledgment really gives people a boost. A boss doesn't have to praise his or her employees all the time, but simply letting them in on the plans for the company or even asking for their feedback makes people employees feel appreciated. I don't know why some managers appear to be unable to register that fact.
Posted by: Susan | March 08, 2012 at 11:01 AM
Susan, it really is that simple, isn't it? Like you, I am baffled by the inability or unwillingness of too many managers to just say "Thank you."
BTW: I asked that question of a client who was not known for recognition/encouragement, yet respected as a manager in many other ways. However, his lack of recognizing people was beginning to inhibit his upward mobility. HIs response: "My people get paid well to do what they do. They are all adults. I'm not a babysitter."
He is no longer a manager, but an individual contributor.
Thanks for taking time to weigh in, Susan.
Posted by: Steve Roesler | March 08, 2012 at 11:28 AM
It is an amazing phenomenon on how few managers and leaders actually embrace day to day recognition. The ones that do have great teams and better overall performance. So the trick is how do we make it easier and part of the culture were everyone is part of the recognition solution. We struggled with the same thing at my advertising agency. We had good managers who did give recognition and feedback regularly and others that did not. So to get a level of consistency and to measure who was using recognition as part of an employee engagement strategy we developed a system called Kudos. I invite you to check it out.
Posted by: Tom Short | March 08, 2012 at 12:25 PM
Tom,
Frequently, in the midst of working with managers, we discover that some people simply need to systematize recognition. They don't have to feel it, they have to do it. So, we help them set up such systems. Obviously, you and your team have turned it into a business that many organizations would be well-served to try out. I enjoyed the website and approach so much that I'm doing an addendum to the post and offering a link to your site. That's not our core business; I sincerely hope it leads to some meaningful inquiries for you guys.
All the best,
Steve
Posted by: Steve Roesler | March 08, 2012 at 01:31 PM
Good post on the important of paying attention to people. I have to offer a bit of a correction though, the Hawthorne Effect refers to the tendency of people being studied to alter their efforts because of the study. Mayo's conclusion was that the workers increased productivity because they felt special, however, much of the evidence behind that conclusion has been called into question. This is perhaps why most business people don't recall it. In my OB class, I briefly touch on the Hawthorne studies for its historical significance (It is an ironic story that the man who birthed the Human Relations movement did it on a poorly designed study.)
Subsequent studies have verified the common sense notion that managers being decent human beings positively affect performance.
Posted by: davidburkus | March 08, 2012 at 03:50 PM
David
You are 100% correct re: the Hawthorne Effect. I am remiss for not stating clearly the distinction between "being paid attention to" vs. "being part of a study".There is no doubt cross-over behavior based simply upon "attention," but I've not seen a study dedicated to sorting out how much was sheer "attention" and how much was the attention given as "part of a study".
Thanks for taking time to point out the distinction. It is an important one.
Posted by: Steve Roesler | March 08, 2012 at 04:54 PM
Thank you Steve. I needed to be reminded of this today. It's nice to know that scientific research has proven what common sense reveals to us everyday.
Posted by: Tim Milburn (@timage) | March 11, 2012 at 06:09 PM
Great post. Influencing and coaching go hand and hand. A 'reward', or recognition program is so beneficial to both organization and managers/leaders - One day, perhaps more will jump aboard the band-wagon!
Posted by: Dr. Dan Neundorf | March 12, 2012 at 08:23 AM
The desire for recognition is a basic human need that must be factored in when managing a team. A structured system of recognition need not be in place. All it takes is for the manager to take a genuine interest in his people and keep them in the loop. Employees will feel motivated to work towards set goals and be productive when they feel they're part of something; that they can contribute and are being appreciated by their superiors.
Posted by: Northlandwhsale | March 13, 2012 at 09:57 AM
Recognition is one key to increase productivity of people. The hard work of the people should not be ignore but to acknowledge it to make them motivated.
Posted by: Melisa | March 23, 2012 at 02:38 PM
You would think this would be something managers would want to do since acknowledging or complimenting people and good work makes you feel good too! It boils down to a human connection that means so much for so little effort.
Posted by: Helen Whelan | March 29, 2012 at 10:25 PM
Imagine the kind of workplace, if all managers/supervisors took a page from Elton Mayo. A little recognition can become a reward in return to the organization and its managers/supervisors.
Posted by: Sandra MarketingEyeAtlanta | April 03, 2012 at 02:37 AM
Wow, so simple, yet so insightful. Building a culture based on simple principles like these could stand to improve organizational productivity at little expense!
Posted by: Janice Meyers | April 08, 2012 at 12:36 AM
Indeed, something every manager should invest some of his/her time. No risk and much in return, what else a manager needs. My two cents, apprasing right individual, for the right reason, at the right time and upto the right level, would make it even better.
Posted by: Haseeb | May 17, 2012 at 08:37 AM
little appreciation and praise will boost employee morale
Posted by: Filemtempatanterbaik.blogspot.com | January 07, 2013 at 09:46 AM