Your Workplace: How Does Culture Impact Perception?

Ewchallenge Clear-thinking people everywhere acknowledge that it's easy for two people to see the same situation very differently.

In a world where we increasingly work across time zones and cultures, this would have even greater meaning if perceptions were influenced by one's culture. While those of us who work globally may have experienced--and thought about-- the inherent reality of these perceptive differences, Canadian and Japanese researchers  have confirmed some very specific distinctions.


When East Doesn't Meet West

According to the study:

Researchers showed Japanese and North American participants images, each of which consisted of one center model and four background models in each image. The researchers manipulated the facial emotion (happy, angry, sad) in the center or background models and asked the participants to determine the dominant emotion of the center figure.

The outcome?

The majority of Japanese participants (72%) reported that their judgments of the center person's emotions were influenced by the emotions of the background figures, while most North Americans (also 72%) reported they were not influenced by the background figures at all.

Takahiko Masuda, a Psychology professor from the University of Alberta, noted:

"Our results demonstrate that when North Americans are trying to figure out how a person is feeling, they selectively focus on that particular person's facial expression, whereas Japanese consider the emotions of the other people in the situation."

This may be because Japanese attention is not concentrated on the individual, but includes everyone in the group, says Masuda.

Why Is This Important for Business?

1. It has always baffled me when I've watched Western corporations decide to indiscriminately import programs and processes that  work well in the East. Looking for a "quick fix" or a "magic pill" is a very North American business characteristic. At the same time, there is no reason not to examine the principles behind things that work elsewhere; then, figure out what might be applicable and how to make it work,

When corporate meeting rooms ring with the cry, "Perception is reality," then Masuda's study should be a caution that global reality can't be driven by local perceptions.

2. Even more specifically, definitions of "team" hugely influence what happens across cultures. North American "teams" are made up of individuals who see themselves as individuals participating in a group with a common purpose for some finite period of time (my observation and experience). Eastern team members honor the group as the important entity to be served, not as a vehicle to one's individual career aspirations.

While time and exposure have somewhat altered instances of the above in the minds of some, Masuda's study should be taken seriously by organizations involved in East-West business and collaboration.

This is one instance where perception can be grounded in reality--for the good of all concerned.

 


 

Like this article? Subscribe to my RSS feed.

Change: It Comes Down to This Question...

This article is the thirty-eighth in a series about Change from Steve Roesler.

Four Questions and a Conversation brought out some good--and varied--comments about Change.

The single idea of the post was a simple one: Whenever announcing or suggesting something "new", it's a good idea to understand the basic questions that most people need to have answered before they can hop on board.

Yet those questions are just a fact-finding mission on the way to the unspoken one:

Medium_calculator What's In It For Me?

If there are 200 or 20,000 employees, there will be 200 or 20,000 individual calculations being made in order to reconcile that question. But nothing of consequence will happen until a critical mass of people have decided that the "new thing" has personal benefits that outweigh the effort to make a change.

Whether it's a small change or a large one, each person involved is  doing the "What's In It For Me?" (WIFFM) calculation.

We've all listened to the "We need to get leaner/increase shareholder value/grow market share" speeches. Most people "get it" when the situation is legitimate and laid out honestly. Yet even the CEO who makes the announcement isn't doing it for shareholder value. The CEO is doing it because (s)he has personal needs to be met: competitiveness, executive lifestyle, reputation...or simply a sense of personal accomplishment. "Shareholder value" is someone else's reason for change.

Why does this matter?

Depending upon the size of the change, people need different amounts of time to do their WIIFM calculation. They also need to hear information more than once, along with the ability to ask questions and discuss implications without being labeled "resistant".

In fact, I've got an idea. Instead of laying on the "resistant" label, how about using "hesitant" instead? That's a word with less baggage and better describes what's really going on.

What do you think about that? Maybe we can get a movement going here.

Note: Special thanks to Bob Cenek for the "WIIFM" suggestion. Bob is back with the popular Cenek Report while in the midst of his own Change projects.

Like this article? Subscribe to my RSS feed.

Communication Problem? Maybe Not, So Try This

How many workplace issues are introduced to you as, "We've got a communication problem?"

"Communication" Doesn't Communicate

Communication is a catch-all phrase. It's  generic, socially acceptable, and really just sends the signal that someone wants to start a conversation. But it probably won't end up being about communication.

Psychologists and counselors refer to these kinds of introductory pronouncements as "presenting" problems." They're  a call for help when someone doesn't know what to do or may not even be aware of the real issue.

Unless you know the genuine issue, you can spend a lot of time creating an elegant solution for the wrong problem.

Cat_2In organizations, communication is the #1  presenting problem.

The next time someone lays a communication issue on you, follow through with:

"That sounds interesting. Help me out. Describe specifically what you see happening and why it's a problem."

You may discover that the Marketing group refused to follow guidelines from Research and ended up slightly misrepresenting a product.

You don't yet know the cause. But you do know the real situation and where to focus your energy.

How many presenting problems can you uncover today?

If you've got a favorite "presenting problem" story, toss it into the mix with a comment below. You may help someone else see how to probe and work on the right thing at the right time.

And if you enjoyed this post, you might also learn from: Use The Right Words At Work

Like this article? Subscribe to my RSS feed.

Employee Needs, Silent Communication, and What To Do

Silence_is001_3

Silent Communication appears to be an oxymoron.

It's not.

Silence communicates powerfully. But because it's, uh, silent, the interpretation is left to the recipient.

Is that what we really want?

Dr. Robyn McMaster gets credit for starting this conversation with How Do You Respond To The Silent Treatment?

From her brain-based expertise, she notes:

"When you doubt and feel anxious, cortisol, a chemical hormone literally floods your brain and nervous system. And, it throws you into a tizzy so you do not think clearly."

Which means that silence causes confusion. But we don't like confusion. So we add our own meaning to the silence in order to reach a state of equilibrium. However, Robin's insight shows that our mental state at that time is actually weakened, so that our conclusions may prove to be less than ideal.

Silence doesn't cause a vacuum so much as it does an irrational mental spiral. That's a formula for trouble in any setting.

Making Someone Disappear and Re-Appear

The act of making a suggestion or comment--then being greeted with total silence--can be insidious. Why? It communicates that a person's very existence isn't being acknowledged. It's very different than the impact of "Gee, I don't know if that idea will work or not" or "Let me think about that."

The second shows relational acknowledgment and engagement and can be built upon. The first discounts one's being.

If your 'hearing" silence, ask this: "Help me understand whether my (comment, suggestion) is a questionable one or are you thinking about it?"

Getting the conversation going again--even if the answer is "I think the idea stinks"--is better for the soul than being deemed non-existent. And can probably lead to an actual productive conversation.

What if We...

...began intentionally teaching about the impact of silence?

I confess that after years of leading seminars and workshops I only address the issue when it arises as a question. More often than not, it's in a consulting situation rather than in the classroom.

What I've learned from hearing myself write is that it's time to become purposeful about silence, communication, and what it means, to one's self and others.

Makes sense to me. What do you think?

Related articles you might like:

Like this article? Subscribe to my RSS feed.

Curious George Wined and Dined on Age of Conversation Tour

By the time Curious George reached the southern part of New Jersey we could tell that Tour Director Steve Woodruff and AoC contributor C.B. Whittemore had already set George's star-status expectations pretty high. He's already sporting a monogrammed chapeaux thanks to C.B.

Cgwpals

George started off by putting together his posse for the South Jersey stay. He decided to make new friends the quick way by sharing Arun Rajagopal's take on Digital Media Conversationalists.







Jimtonicg


CG
used his resources to dazzle Minerals Technologies  VP Jim Brownhill and wife, Toni. When Jim started an after-dinner rave about virtual teams, The Curious One suggested a look at the way Luc Debaisieux approaches the whole idea of Shared Consciousness.


Cgpiano3




Unable to contain his inner lounge lizard, George commandeered the piano bar with the hope that Director Tom would use his show-stopping rendition of Feelings in an upcoming video.



Barbstevecg



Barb and I will miss CG (even though his tastes are becoming a little high-maintenance already). Tuesday he makes the commute with me to Manhattan where he'll no-doubt hit on Greg Verdino for dinner and a show.





Most of all: Curious George cares about helping kids through Variety:The Children's Charity.

You can be a part of that with your own copy of The Age of Conversation. With 103 ideas from 103 different authors you'll be the best-informed person in the room, whether it's a meeting room, banquet room, or social setting.

Here are the more than 100 authors who hope you'll join the conversation and reach out to kids in need as a result:

FORMATS & PRICES :

Hardbacks $29.99
Paperbacks $16.95
E-book $9.99

Background
Dedication
SITE : www.ageofconversation.com
About the authors : Arun Rajagopal
Google map of the authors:  Matt Dickmann

   

AUTHORS :

A Anderson   Roger
Andrlik Todd
Annan Kofi
Armano   David
B Bannister Steve
Beck Cam
Behan   Jordan
Berkowitz   David
Bird   Susan
Blair Mark
Bloomberg   Toby
Brazeal   David
C Carroll   Becky
Chatfield   Katie
Clark   Tony D.
Clasper   Emily
Clifford Tom
Collier   Mack
Corbett   Peter
Corrigan   Chris
Cotton Ed
D Dawn   Wells Kimberly
De   Krishna
Debaisieux   Luc
Desager   Geert
Desai   Rishi
Deutschman   Pete
Dickman   Matt
E Earls Mark
F Facchini   Gianandrea
Farmery   Anna
Fleischer   Julie
G Gerbyshak   Phil
Giorgi   Cedric
Glaza Bob
Goren   Mark
Gorski   Kristin
Green   Janet
Green   Lewis
H Hagy Jessica
Handley Ann
Heaton Gavin
Hill Dr.   Graham
Hoet Kris
Hook Uwe
Howard Sean
Hruzek   Bob
Huntington   Richard
J Jackson  Tim
Jacobsen Dustin
James AJ
Johnson   Stanley
Jones Spike
Jussel   Amy
K Kay Gareth
Kerley Christina (CK)
Klaver   Kim
Koopmans   David
Kukral Jim
L La Grou John
Long Karl
M Magno   Lori
Maltoni   Valeria
Manning   Carolyn
McEnany   Paul
McKay Colin
McLellan Drew
Mishra Gaurav
Monty Scott
Morton   Michael
N Newlan Chris
Nulman Andy
P Payn   Simon
Polinchock   David
R Raasch   Joe
Rajagopal Arun
Rasmussen   Ryan
Reece   Connie
Reed   Emily
Reich Brian
Reich   David
Renshaw Sandy
Rice Nick
Roesler   Steve
Rosenberg   Roberta
S Sacrum
Sansone   Mike
Schaber   Patrick
Schoeniger   Gary
Shevlin   Ron
Shiels Jamey
Silverstein   Cord
Snell   Nathan
V Vellandi   Mario
Verdino   Greg
Vineberg   S. Neil
von Oech   Roger
W Whittemore C.B.
Wilson Craig
Woodruff Steve
Worman   Troy
Wright   Nick
Y Yakob   Faris

Like this article? Subscribe to my RSS feed.

Age of Conversation: The Musical

Page_1_6 Before The Age of Conversation made it possible for people globally to help kids through The Variety Club, we raised money the old-fashioned way in Philadelphia: we sang for it (false_alarm.mp3).

I wondered when the shot on the left taken from an ABC broadcast would come in handy:TaDa!

Back in the day, our group did the Philly-Atlantic City circuit singing acapella street corner doo-wop . During one of our "Hey, We're Not Dead Yet!" revivals we did a spot on a TV show to help raise money for the Variety Club--a charity that has always been huge in the Philadelphia area. It was an honor to be a part of it. (Note: Yes, the suits glowed in the dark).

Great Buzz, Great Book, Great Cause

Fast Company, Business Week, Ad Age , and other publications worldwide have latched on to the phen